0535. Going beyond the base deficit to predict mortality

The base deficit, a measure that is available from routine blood gas analysis, has been incorporated into mortality risk scores, used to assist in clinical decision-making and incorporated into APLS guidelines. While no one disputes the value of a significant base deficit, intensivists continue to explore the bigger picture, looking into factors such as lactate levels per se, non-lactate 'unmeasured' anions, strong ions and weak acids. In a study from Cape Town, researchers measured blood gases, electrolytes and lactate and calculated 'unmeasured' anions in order to assess whether mortality was correlated better with the nature of the acidosis (hyperlactataemia, hyperchchloraemia or occult anionaemia) than with the magnitude thereof. Forty-six shocked children admitted to the PICU were studied. Diagnoses included gastroenteritis, septicaemia, myocarditis, near-drowning and poisoning. Mortality rate was 35%, with non-survivors differing from survivors in terms of lactate levels (11,6 vs 3,3 mmol/l) but not by pH, base excess, unmeasured anions or corrected chloride (although the latter showed a trend towards higher chloride levels in survivors). Area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) was best for lactate (0,83) followed by the PIM score (Paediatric Index of Mortality) at 0,71. The authors comment that the base excess may miss true metabolic acidosis in >15% of cases, concealed by alkalinizing factors such as hypoalbuminaemia. On the other hand they caution that endotoxin may inactivate pyruvate dehydrogenase, thereby elevating lactate and giving a false impression of hyperlactataemia from tissue hypoxia-ischaemia. The Cape Town conclusion was that lactate may be a helpful measure but should not be used in isolation and in fact on its own is not much more useful than the admission PIM score. Other researchers have found different results, with corrected anion gap or strong ion gap correlating better with tissue acidosis or mortality respectively. Bottom line is that there is indeed more to interpretation of blood gas analysis than simple use of the base excess/deficit figure.

Read more:
Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 286-291
Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004; 5: 240-5 and 2005; 6: 281-5
Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1577-81

 

<BACK

HOME